🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of the publication Authentic, writer the author issues a provocation: typical directives to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are far from well-meaning invitations for personal expression – they’re traps. Burey’s debut book – a mix of personal stories, studies, cultural critique and conversations – seeks to unmask how organizations co-opt identity, shifting the weight of institutional change on to staff members who are often marginalized.

Personal Journey and Broader Context

The motivation for the book lies partially in the author’s professional path: various roles across corporate retail, startups and in worldwide progress, interpreted via her background as a disabled Black female. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and aiming for security – is the driving force of her work.

It emerges at a period of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across America and other regions, as backlash to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs mount, and numerous companies are cutting back the very frameworks that once promised progress and development. Burey delves into that arena to argue that withdrawing from authenticity rhetoric – specifically, the business jargon that trivializes identity as a set of surface traits, peculiarities and interests, keeping workers preoccupied with handling how they are seen rather than how they are treated – is not the answer; rather, we should reframe it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Display of Persona

By means of vivid anecdotes and conversations, the author demonstrates how underrepresented staff – employees from diverse backgrounds, LGBTQ+ individuals, female employees, employees with disabilities – quickly realize to adjust which identity will “pass”. A weakness becomes a liability and people overcompensate by attempting to look palatable. The effort of “presenting your true self” becomes a projection screen on which numerous kinds of anticipations are placed: emotional labor, revealing details and continuous act of thankfulness. As the author states, workers are told to share our identities – but absent the safeguards or the reliance to withstand what arises.

According to the author, we are asked to share our identities – but lacking the safeguards or the reliance to survive what emerges.’

Case Study: An Employee’s Journey

The author shows this situation through the story of an employee, a employee with hearing loss who chose to teach his co-workers about the culture of the deaf community and communication practices. His eagerness to share his experience – an act of transparency the organization often commends as “genuineness” – briefly made everyday communications smoother. However, Burey points out, that advancement was fragile. When employee changes wiped out the informal knowledge Jason had built, the culture of access disappeared. “All the information went away with the staff,” he states tiredly. What stayed was the exhaustion of having to start over, of being made responsible for an organization’s educational process. In Burey’s view, this illustrates to be told to share personally lacking safeguards: to risk vulnerability in a structure that applauds your honesty but declines to formalize it into policy. Sincerity becomes a trap when companies count on individual self-disclosure rather than structural accountability.

Writing Style and Concept of Dissent

Burey’s writing is both lucid and poetic. She blends scholarly depth with a style of connection: a call for audience to participate, to question, to dissent. For Burey, professional resistance is not loud rebellion but principled refusal – the practice of opposing uniformity in workplaces that require appreciation for basic acceptance. To resist, in her framing, is to question the stories companies tell about fairness and belonging, and to reject engagement in customs that sustain inequity. It might look like identifying prejudice in a gathering, opting out of unpaid “diversity” work, or setting boundaries around how much of oneself is offered to the institution. Opposition, Burey indicates, is an assertion of personal dignity in environments that often encourage obedience. It is a habit of principle rather than defiance, a approach of asserting that an individual’s worth is not based on organizational acceptance.

Restoring Sincerity

Burey also rejects rigid dichotomies. Authentic avoids just discard “sincerity” completely: on the contrary, she urges its reclamation. According to the author, authenticity is not simply the unfiltered performance of individuality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more deliberate harmony between individual principles and individual deeds – an integrity that opposes distortion by corporate expectations. Instead of treating sincerity as a requirement to disclose excessively or adapt to sanitized ideals of candor, Burey urges followers to keep the aspects of it rooted in honesty, personal insight and principled vision. In her view, the objective is not to give up on sincerity but to move it – to remove it from the corporate display practices and toward connections and workplaces where reliance, equity and accountability make {